Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] Galileo build status


Rich, and fellow Galileo build non-contributors:

With respect to JET, yes, I will continue updating the Galileo contribution.

As for the others, my guess is that some misunderstanding on what is required to be included in the Galileo build model. I clearly screwed something up :-)

Information (which I just re-read) is available at:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo/Build

I missed the part about adding a reference to my .build file to the main galileo.build.

I imagine most components are using Nick's modeling build and thus have (or can) easily generate component .build files. In that case, am I correct in saying that all that remains is letting Rich know, and he'll integrate it into galileo.build?

Paul



From: "Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2009-01-08 09:01 AM
Subject: [modeling-pmc] Galileo build status





Hi All,
 
With M4 Galileo builds underway, I notice not all Modeling components that declared a desire to participate are included in the Galileo build model.  Specifically, I see the following issues:
 
XSD: is included, but you may want to change your template used to generate mdt-xsd.build to have a better label than “EMF” ;)
 
JET: was included by me recently to allow STP to board the train.  It’s up-to-date for the JET M4 build and I expect Paul will be updating in the future?
 
CDO & Net4j: recently updated the contact list, but is the content ready for inclusion in galileo.build?
 
Teneo: untouched since my initial port from .sc to .build – is Teneo not on the Galileo train?  Or, can the current emf-teneo.build model be included as-is?  https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=253333#c4
 
Ecore Tools: same story, only the initial .build model exists.  I don’t see a breakdown of EMFT components to be included here, so can it be created? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=260196
 
Mint: on the train and ready to be included?
 
MWE: same question
 
Search: same question
 
Xpand: same question
 
Xtext: same question
 
And before you indicate your build model is ready to be included, PLEASE verify your update site and model content is correct.  All sites should have p2 metadata repositories and your URL should not end in /site.xml to allow p2 to bypass this anachronistic method.
 
Also, order is important in the Galileo model.  Let me know what prereqs you have so that when I add your contribution to the model it builds properly.
 
Thanks,
Rich
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc



Back to the top