We did not discuss this but here is what I would suggest.
1. Daniel as the Build master needs to +1 the package on epp mailing
list
2. Ronnie as the Pulsar leader needs to +1 the package on epp mailing
list
Also at RC3 and RC4 we need to have each SDK provider +1 that they are
ready to be included. I think this should be done on the Pulsar
mailing list.
Does this make sense?
Ian
On 6/4/2010 9:35 AM, Marcel Gorri wrote:
Hi guys,
yesterday it was holiday here in Brazil, and we couldn't join
the meeting. I checked the meeting minutes, but I couldn't find an
answer for Eric's question:
"There
are several important dates where certain actions must be taken.
Let's make sure we cover those early and monitor the results since
Brazil is 1 hour ahead of EDT at this point. There is a "go/no-go" on
June 22 for Pulsar from the maintainer. I'm not sure if this action
is taken by Daniel Pastore as the build master, me as the Sequoyah
Will we want download stats? Are we set up for it?
If is is an easy change I would say +1 but at this late date I don't
think we should introduce any change that might break the build.
There are several important dates where certain actions must be taken.
Let's make sure we cover those early and monitor the results since
Brazil is 1 hour ahead of EDT at this point. There is a "go/no-go" on
June 22 for Pulsar from the maintainer. I'm not sure if this action
is taken by Daniel Pastore as the build master, me as the Sequoyah
lead, or Ronnie as the Pulsar lead.
Lets talk about this on the Pulsar call on Thursday.
Thanks for all your hard work getting us to this point. Hopefully all
the attention to detail will result in an easy release in 3 weeks.
I agree. It has bee great to see everyone work to make this a
reality. Thank you!