Hi,
I just created a
component in MTJ bugzilla called Pulsar. If you guys want, we can use it to
open bugs, attach patches, etc. (the main URL to file bugs is: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=MTJ.
Just select Pulsar component). It is also possible to use the working group wiki. It is open to
everyone to add / edit pages.
Since there is no
pulsar specific repository right now, we can also use MTJ. We can adapt MTJ
build to generate a Pulsar specific feature with all code that will be part of
Pulsar distribution (at least thats what we initially imagined). So if anyone
ants to contribute code on pulsar, he needs to follow a usual eclipse
contribution process:
-
File a
bug on MTJ/Pulsar
-
Attach
the contribution
-
MTJ
committers will review and commit the code to the SVN that will be available
on the next nightly build
Does that make
sense?
J
gep
De: mobile-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mobile-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Em
nome de Ronnie.King@xxxxxxxxx
Enviada em: terça-feira, 7 de abril de
2009 22:38
Para:
mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: [mobile-iwg] Weekly
(Technical) Pulsar Call - Thursday, April 9th
Todd,
Thanks for jumping
in with this, the p2 apis are the area that we have the most concern with
right now. Any information you could provide would be really appreciated.
Since we do not have a bugzilla to track this with, for simplicity Id say
lets just use email for now.
Regards,
Ronnie
On 4/7/09
6:39 PM, "ext Christian Kurzke" <christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Todd, Ronnie,
Thanks
for stepping up so quickly!
Todd,
Depending on the type of
write-up your team has done, you can either
update (or create a new page)
on the Wiki site.
Or, if it is easier - just mail out an attachment to this
list, we can
use it as a basis for discussion in the call on
Thursday.
Unfortunately we dont yet have a proper "document repository"
for Pulsar.
-Christian
Todd Williams wrote:
>
Christian & Ronnie
> I asked my some of my Pulse <http://www.poweredbypulse.com>
team for
> guidance on how you could implement the SDK delivery
requirements
> using native p2. They wrote up a quick set up steps and a
bit of
> example code to illustrate the points. I was going to ask on
the
> Thursday call what you thought would be the best way to contribute
the
> information to the group. However, I saw Ronnie's message and
didn't
> want his team to waste time if the information I had would give
them a
> headstart. So, would updating the wiki be the best way to
communicate
> this information?
> Regards,
>
Todd
>
> ----- Original Message
-----
> *From:* Ronnie.King@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Ronnie.King@xxxxxxxxx>
>
*To:* mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2009 5:35 PM
>
*Subject:* Re: [mobile-iwg] Weekly (Technical) Pulsar
Call -
> Thursday, April 9th
>
>
Hi Christian,
>
>
I have allocated two developers on my team to start
research on
> the p2 engine and viewer
requirements as of today. Ill work on
>
updating the wiki pages to reflect the areas that we
are planning
> on contributing
to.
>
> Some areas that would be helpful
to clarify:
>
> *
Are we tracking the feature discussions in MTJs bugzilla as
>
we do in other
projects such as CDT? If so, should there be
>
a Pulsar component
added?
> * Do you have a
location in MTJ svn for hosting the code?
>
>
>
Regards,
>
Ronnie
>
>
>
On 4/6/09 6:42 PM, "ext Christian Kurzke" <christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
wrote:
>
>
Hello
Everyone,
>
>
After a very busy EclipseCon
meeting, I would like to resume the
>
Bi-Weekly Pulsar Meeting
Schedule.
>
> The
main focus of this meeting is to review the list of tasks
>
which need
>
to be accomplished by working
group members before the Galileo
>
deadline.
>
>
For an overview, please
see:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/GalileoExecutionPlan
>
>
This diagram shows a large
number of tasks currently are NOT
>
STAFFED.
>
On the right side I included a
column with my best judgment
>
which company
>
would posses the right skills
for this task.
> A more
detailed description of the expected skills can be
>
found here:
>
http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/GalileoPulsarWorkItems
>
>
I ask every company to review
those items and for the meeting
>
make a
>
decision if they can
contribute engineering headcount for any
>
of those
>
tasks.
>
(Please note: My assignment of
company names to tasks is only a
>
suggestion, and of course not
binding!)
>
> The
full agenda with dial-in information is here:
>
>
http://wiki.eclipse.org/EMIWG/MembersCall-09-April-2009
>
>
Best Regards,
>
>
Christian
Kurzke
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
mobile-iwg mailing
list
> mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
_______________________________________________
>
mobile-iwg mailing list
>
mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
_______________________________________________
> mobile-iwg mailing
list
> mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg
>
_______________________________________________
mobile-iwg
mailing list
mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg