Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT][MicroProfile Metrics 5.0] Specification -

[Roberto Cortez <radcortez@xxxxxxxxx>]

-1 (Red Hat)

Red Hat believes that a better approach is to follow the OpenTelemetry initiative, which is already well established and covers a comprehensive set of system components, including cloud providers, applications, and tooling in the Metrics area.

On 22 Nov 2022, at 18:45, Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To approve and ratify the Release Review of MicroProfile Metrics 5.0 Specification, the Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification Committee and the Community to provide feedback during the approval process using the relevant documents:

https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/issues/181

This ballot will be fourteen days, ending on Tuesday, December 6th.  However, it will be great if you can vote before December 2nd. The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members.  There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be counted.

--

Thank you

Emily Jiang on behalf of the MicroProfile Steering Committee

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg