Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mdt-papyrus.dev] [DSML][Profile] Look for your point of view against derived property implementation

Dear Papyrus Devs,

 

I’m not a member of the dev team, so I suppose I have no voting rights.

I would like to point to the issue I submitted in this context:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=489151 (invalidating the proposal 2)

 

I suppose you are already considering that concern.

 

Thanks,

Johan

 

Van: mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Namens SMAOUI Asma
Verzonden: donderdag 21 december 2017 16:11
Aan: Papyrus Project list <mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Onderwerp: [mdt-papyrus.dev] [DSML][Profile] Look for your point of view against derived property implementation

 

Hello,

 

Papyrus team manage to choose only one pattern to be used to get the value of a derived property in a static profile.

 

As mentioned in a previous discussion https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mdt-papyrus.dev/msg03313.html there seems to be 3 methods:

  1. Generate code + modify the getter method and add a @generated Not annotation (The one used in MARTE)
  2. Generate code + override factory in extension point (The one used in SysML 1.4)
  3. Generate code (with UML2 option) + add @generated Not (but only in specific packages named operation) (used in Moka project and preferred by Christian Damus J )

Please feel free to express your preference about those 3 different patterns.

Best Regards,

Asma


Back to the top