[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[mdt-ocl.dev] GIT Practice
|
Hi
Branch names
-------------------
Axel has used bugs/nnnn. I've used bug/nnn. We need to standardize. I
thought one of the GIT tutorials had a recommendation but can't find it.
Presumably the branches get renamed/deleted after push otherwise the
remote tracking will become unmanageable.
Should we rename historic branches to have hierarchy: e.g. maintenance/3.0?
Bugzilla status
--------------------
I think anyone can commit to a bug branch at any time. Eventually the
bug branch is submitted for review as a result of which +1's authorize
push to master and consequently RESOLVED. cf
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=348504 where my +1 seems
to have been interpreted as commit to bug branch which then got a
RESOLVED without a push to master.
SSH keys
-----------
Axel: I'm waiting for clarification on what keys you want me to put where.
Size
-----
I'm already finding GIT incredibly slow. The tutorials recommend small
repositories. I'm wondering if we should be partitioning.
Working Directory
-------------------------
EGIT seems to create a Working Directory and Eclipse seems to use it for
Import Projects, which puzzles me as regards switching branches. I
expect my Workspace files to be extra-repository, whereas GIT seems to
have them 'inside'. Has GIT/me done something stupid?
Regards
Ed