Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mdht-dev] Regarding CDA validation using MDHT
I simply cloned the branch mars from https://git.eclipse.org/r/mdht/org.eclipse.mdht and built it locally and pushed it to my local repo, so that is where the models are. Basically what is described on https://github.com/oehf/ipf/issues/118

On 2 September 2016 at 14:06, sean.muir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <sean.muir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jens - There was nothing specific modified so it is best to start with the model and the corresponding OCL to determine what if anything has changed
Can you send a link to where the models/runtimes are ?

We used Consol2 as our benchmark for changes during the change over to eclipse but perhaps this particular constraint was not in consol2

on another note - your issue talks about mdht being a maven project but having some issues which we are aware of -

the general issue developers run into is that we use tycho to support our dependencies which works very well - 
the files are deployed to a p2 repository which when referenced from another tycho maven build pulls down all the dependencies
so in a tycho maven project we can use

<dependency>org.eclipse.cda.uml</depedency>  and it will operate appropriately

the issue is most people use mdht dependencies in other tycho build - we had reached out to the tycho project to see if others have similar requirements but got no response

the appropriate path is allow a dependency such as above properly resolve dependencies - this will probably required a maven plugin which we have not had time/resource to implement

if you know if someone with maven plugin experience who would be willing to assist use that would be most appreciated

thanks

Sean Muir
MDHT


On Sep 2, 2016, at 7:07 AM, Jens Villadsen <jenskristianvilladsen@gmail.com> wrote:

Long story short, I've been using the ipf project (https://github.com/oehf/ipf) for doing some CDA validation tasks. ipf depends on MDHT but have been using an older version. Now, as seen on https://github.com/oehf/ipf/issues/118, actions have been carried out to update the dependencies to a newer MDHT version, however, there seems to be some unit on the ipf side that no longer works as expected.

To be specific, it regards the validation of a Clinical Document.I would expect that a Call to CDAUtil.validate would inspect the typeId to see if it conforms to both the root and extension being 
2.16.840.1.113883.1.3 and POCD_HD000040. This is however not the case. Is that intentional?
--

Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards

Jens Kristian Villadsen
cand.polyt

Stålhøjen 24
8240 Risskov
Denmark

Mobile +4523373806
jenskristianvilladsen@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
mdht-dev mailing list
mdht-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdht-dev


_______________________________________________
mdht-dev mailing list
mdht-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdht-dev




--

Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards

Jens Kristian Villadsen
cand.polyt

Stålhøjen 24
8240 Risskov
Denmark

Mobile +4523373806
jenskristianvilladsen@xxxxxxxxx

Back to the top