[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [m2t-dev] Move backend to m2t.core?
|
>From my point of view, separate components == separate builds. If you
don't plan to release 'common' or 'shared' or 'core' or 'underlying
framework stuff' as separate releases with separate committers /
schedules / plans... then you might as well merge it into one
component w/ multiple plugins/features underneath.
+1 for just one, assuming that it meets your (and your community's)
collective needs.
Nick
On Feb 4, 2008 10:40 AM, Bernd Kolb <b.kolb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From my point of view, one is enough.
>
> I think the idea was to have one more internal kind of thing and another
> thing with contains common tools like jmerge or the recipes framework.
> However I think m2t common is enough.
>
>
>
> Bernd
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
> Bernd Kolb
>
> (b.kolb@xxxxxxxxxxx)
>
> http://www.kolbware.de
>
>
>
> --
>
> KolbWare
>
> (Beratung & Coaching)
>
> Bernd Kolb
>
> Franz-Marc Str. 35
>
> 89520 Heidenheim
>
>
>
> Mobil: 0163/7321605
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: m2t-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2t-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Paul Elder
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:23 PM
> To: Model to Text
> Subject: Re: [m2t-dev] Move backend to m2t.core?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> As Sven has replied. The component name is m2t.common. But, I'm for it.
> Also, I wonder whether we really need m2t.common AND m2t.shared. Their
> purposes are very similar. Thoughts?
>
> Paul
>
> Paul Elder
> IBM Rational Software
> Tel: +1-613-599-3916 (until Feb 18, 2008)
> Tel: +1 613-270-4560 (after Feb 18, 2008)
> E-mail: pelder@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Arno Haase <arno.haase@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: m2t-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 2008-02-01 10:14 AM
>
>
> Please respond to
> Model to Text <m2t-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> To
>
> Model to Text <m2t-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> [m2t-dev] Move backend to m2t.core?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> the backend development is progressing nicely. And it is intended as
> part of a common infrastructure that integrates all m2t languages, so I
> think it should be moved to m2t.core.
>
> Any opinions on this?
>
> - Arno
>
>
> --
> Arno Haase
> Langemarckstr. 16
> 53227 Bonn
>
> Mobil: +49 160 98525085
> Tel: +49 228 9654443
> Fax: +49 228 9654448
>
> _______________________________________________
> m2t-dev mailing list
> m2t-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2t-dev
> _______________________________________________
> m2t-dev mailing list
> m2t-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2t-dev
>
>