Thanks Axel & François-Régis
@andrew! I guess you know about this already?
regards
______________________________
Jad El-khoury, PhD
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mechatronics Division
Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: +46(0)8 790 6877 Mobile: +46(0)70 773 93 45
jad@xxxxxx,
www.kth.se
From: lyo-dev <lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Axel Reichwein
Sent: Saturday, 14 August 2021 14:41
To: Lyo project developer discussions <lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lyo-dev] OSLC QM new call for Statements of Use
If necessary, Koneksys can provide one in a few weeks.
I will, but only next week (off this week). We are also working on a « server » implementation for our Jira adapter.
Hi
Any chance someone on this mailing list that might have a statement of use?
______________________________
Jad El-khoury, PhD
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mechatronics Division
Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: +46(0)8 790 6877 Mobile: +46(0)70 773 93 45
jad@xxxxxx,
www.kth.se
Dear OSLC users and OP community members,
I would like to announce a new call for OSLC QM statements of use. Chet has clarified that conformant clients that have “successfully used” the specification to establish an integration with a conformant OSLC QM server qualify. If you
have implemented a QM client that has integrated with a conformant OSLC QM server, we kindly ask that you consider submitting a statement of use. Please indicate which OSLC QM server you have tested your client against. We need one more SoU to submit the specification
to be considered for publication as OASIS Standard. Feel free to forward this call to your colleagues or suppliers who may provide such a statement. Thank you in advance!
Sample statement:
%CompanyName% has successfully implemented the OSLC Quality Management Version 2.1 Project Specification 01 (https://docs.oasis-open-projects.org/oslc-op/qm/v2.1/ps01/quality-management-spec.html
dated 27 August 2020), in accordance with the conformance clauses defined in Section "Conformance" of the specification. This use of the specification includes interoperation with other similar independent implementations, as well as integration with tools
supporting other OSLC domain specifications.
Best regards,
Andrew Berezovskyi
OSLC PGB co-chair
Jim, yes, that is certainly the correct interpretation. There are other specifications that have implemented roles of client versus server. KMIP and PKCS #11 are two examples that come immediately to mind. ODF and, I believe, LegalDocML
make a similar distinction between applications that can create conforming documents and applications that display them or otherwise do something useful with the document.
I'd certainly judge a client that consumes data from an OSLC server to have 'successfully used' the specification and thus be able to provide a Statement of Use.
The OASIS definition of
Statements of Use says "... is a written statement that a party has successfully used or implemented that specification in accordance with all or some of its conformance clauses, identifying those clauses that apply, and stating whether its use included
the interoperation of multiple independent implementations".
The OSLC-OP PGB would like a clarification on the intended meaning of "successfully used or implemented". Some background: The OSLC-OP specifications are written from the perspective
of conformance clauses that must be implemented by OSLC servers - applications that are providing access to resources and services on those resources according to the OSLC REST services.
We had been soliciting Statements of Use only from OASIS Member organizations that are implementing OSLC servers. However, we recognize that many of these servers play a dual role,
acting as an OSLC Client of other OSLC Servers in order to create cross server links using delegated dialogs, displaying resource previews of resources managed by another server, etc.
In considering Statements Of Use, we would like to be able to also consider OSLC Clients, that although they do not implement the conformance clauses from the perspective of a server,
they certainly have to use those conformance clauses in order to successfully interact with any OSLC server.
Is this what is meant by "successfully used or implemented that specification"? Can we include both clients and servers as candidates for Statements of Use for OSLC-OP specifications?
--
|
![]()
|
Chet Ensign
Chief Technical Community Steward
OASIS Open
|
|
|
|
|
Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#615) |
Reply To Group |
Reply To Sender |
Mute This Topic |
New Topic
Your Subscription |
Contact Group Owner |
Unsubscribe [jad@xxxxxx]
_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev
|
