Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:59:36 +0200
Delivered-to: lsp4e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/lsp4e-dev>
List-help: <mailto:lsp4e-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lsp4e-dev>, <mailto:lsp4e-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/lsp4e-dev>, <mailto:lsp4e-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 2:52 PM Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Something is strange (outside my experience). The aggrcon file lists lsp4e as a feature, but it is a plug-in. Is that expected?

Having just bundles works ;)

Should we have features for LSP4E too?

What would be the value? (note that it's not a "no", it's a genuine question)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution
  - From: Doug Schaefer

References:
- [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution
  - From: Jonah Graham
- Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution
  - From: Mickael Istria
- Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution
  - From: Jonah Graham

Prev by Date: Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution
Next by Date: Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution
Previous by thread: Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution
Next by thread: Re: [lsp4e-dev] simrel contribution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top