Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] FW: New CQ for SFCurve - GeoWave indexing subproject
Hi Sharon,

Great to hear GeoWave is so close to the finish line. I certainly don't want this to put a wrench in the process at all. The SFCurve CQ would be more appropriate if the GeoWave IP review had a long road ahead of it, which I'm glad to hear isn't the case. Based on what you said, it sounds like the timeline we need this into SFCurve is much longer than the Initial Contribution timeline - we want this change to use in GeoTrellis 2.0, which is slated for end of year. So, what you proposed - to just keep going with the GeoWave Initial Contribution CQ, and once that is resolved to resolve the SFCurve CQ - sounds like the best way forward. 

Thanks for the info and the work on getting GeoWave IP reviewed!

Best,
Rob

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Rob:

Thanks very much for helping to bring this to our attention.    

 

Its important for the team to be aware we are extremely far down the road of completing the full IP review for the Geowave Initial codebase.  In fact, I should be able to get final questions out to Rich today/tomorrow.  At this stage of the game, it truly would not be advantageous for our internal processes and practices to start removing content from a review that has almost reached the finish line.  In fact, it could potentially have a negative impact on the remaining effort for Geowave and potentially put SFCurve in an indefinite state as well.


If the Geowave CQ can be resolved before the end of this week with no changes required to the content, we can then simply approve the Indexing CQ you have raised for tracking purposes which would be a requirement in this case.

Does this sound reasonable?

Best Regards,
Sharon

 

 

From: Thea Aldrich [mailto:thea.aldrich@eclipse-foundation.org]
Sent: September-25-17 3:28 PM
To: LocationTech Technology project PMC mailing list <technology-pmc@locationtech.org>; Marc Vloemans <marc.vloemans@eclipse-foundation.org>; emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx; Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@eclipse-foundation.org>; Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@eclipse-foundation.org>; Sharon Macdonald <sharon.macdonald@eclipse-foundation.org>; Stephanie <stephanie.swart@eclipse-foundation.org>; Paul White <paul.white@eclipse-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] New CQ for SFCurve - GeoWave indexing subproject

 

Hi Rob,

I +1'ed the cq and have added emo to this email so they can stay up to date on what we have cooking on the LocationTech side. 

 

This is an interesting question and I am keen to see what the EMO team recommends etc moving forward. I suspect this will keep coming. I am sure this is something the team has encountered.

 

Additionally, it is so incredible to see all the projects making helping push eachother forward!

 

More soon,

Thea

 

 

 

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Rob Emanuele <rdemanuele@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi PMC,

 

 

It's the GeoWave subproject that contains their core indexing code. After discussion with Rich, we decided that the GeoTrellis team would do the work of extracting the part of the GeoWave code that was the core indexing code, and put it into SFCurve. This helps the GeoTrellis project, because we want to rely on the SFCurve, and need some of the functionality in the GeoWave indexing project.

 

GeoWave is currently in incubation, and approve for parallel checkin. While there's already an IP check of their codebase going on, this CQ is meant to speed up the approval of a small part of the codebase, so that we can feel comfortable merging it into SFCurve, which is already out of incubation.

 

We weren't sure if we even needed a CQ for this, but figured better safe than sorry. Can we can some discussion or a +1 for this CQ?

 

Thanks,

Rob


_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@locationtech.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

 


Back to the top