Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval for the initial Proj4J contribution

[Martin Davis <mtnclimb@xxxxxxxxx>]

It shows me as the author of 90%. Is that fair, since most of the projection code was ported from PROJ4?  I guess this could refer just to the net new parts, in which case it's close enough.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Jim Hughes <jnh5y@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

The CQ for Proj4J's initial contribution is here: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12642.

I'm voting +1 for it.  Shout if there is any dissent.

Cheers,

Jim

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@locationtech.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc