Hi Rob,
I believe having a CQ for Proj4J indicating that you are distributed
the source code modified should be ok. I think Eclipse legal might
ask those questions for a reason; I don't think we need to get hung
up on that issue.
The only question I'd ask is... Did you exhaust the options to
contribute the changes/bug fixes to any original project, etc? I
imagine you have, but just wanted to make sure you aren't forking
the project into GeoTrellis without good cause.
Cheers,
Jim
On 10/7/2016 7:16 PM, Rob Emanuele
wrote:
Hey PMC,
We submitted a CQ for the original proj4j code (based on
the codebase of the OSGeo project).
This one is a bit weird: we have actually taken this code
and absorbed it into our codebase. There was no publishing of
artifacts under the original project guidance, and GeoTrellis
needed some fixes in order for it to work with Spark, so we
took the codebase on. We have since submitted a version to be
part of LocationTech, so that process is at a start; however
the IP team wanted a CQ submitted for the original codebase so
that they could review it's inclusion into GeoTrellis. Can I
get a PMC +1 or some discussion if people object?
Thanks,
Rob
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
|
