Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] More GeoMesa CQs

The license should already be listed on the CQs (except for piggyback CQs).

Other requirements are, of course, at the discretion of the PMC (I recommend that you discuss them).

Wayne

On 13/11/15 10:52 AM, david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Thanks Wayne.

So as we ask each other to approve our dependencies, I think the proposer should state:
* what is the license
* that the proposer did due diligence in looking for another CQ — and if found another version then why it can’t be piggy-backed.

If you do that Jim, and assuming there are no GPL licenses, I’ll +1 the CQs.
~ David

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
EclipseCon
          Europe 2015

Back to the top