Subject: Re: [Technology-pmc] tech-pmc dependency informal procedure |
From: Wayne Beaton <wayne@eclipse.org> |
Date: 07/02/2013 02:21 PM |
To: technology-pmc@locationtech.org |
From earlier conversations it seems the Technology PMC is up to its own devices for handling dependency discussion.
Since we are just starting out I am going to try out the following convention. This is just a starting point, we can revise it over time as needed.
1. Email technology-pmc@locationtech.org for each dependency- this gives a discussion thread to link to in the CQ
2. Hold the conversation open for three business days- If the discussion finishes up the CQ can get a +1,-1 vote as appropriate
3. After three business days with no discussion I will self approve the CQ
I expect we will only have a decent discussion on new dependencies. For simple version upgrades the above cycle will act more as notification and opportunity to communicate.
Cheers--Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________ Technology-pmc mailing list Technology-pmc@locationtech.org https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc