[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Opxml question
|
Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>>> * William Cohen <wcohen@xxxxxxxxxx> [2011-02-10 09:27]:
>>>>> On 02/10/2011 09:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>>>>>> what's the status of abandoning opxml?
>>>>>>> It seems to me that it's still in use...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The upcoming 0.7 release removes its use.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>>>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool, that would allow the elimination of oprofile-devel and it's undesirable static libraries.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is 0.7 going to make it for Fedora 15?
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps. I'll also have to verify my above statement :)
>>>
>>> The R0_7_0 tag and trunk don't use opxml anymore. What's left is some
>>> left-over code removal and documentation update.
>
>> So I presume the updated oprofile plugin will leverage the native XML
>> output from opreport, right?
>
> Yes.
>
>> And how about the events list? Does it
>> use the XML output from ophelp?
>
> Yes.
>
>> If so, this is really good news from
>> my perspective since (as I had noted in my Jan 14 posting) the current
>> version of this plugin is completely broken for IBM Power systems.
>
> We would very much appreciate feedback about the Eclipse oprofile
> plug-in >= 0.7.0 on IBM Power systems.
My team member, Daniel (on cc), will have a look. I presume he should install from http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/updates-nightly?
Thanks.
-Maynard
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Severin
>