[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Re-spun 0.2.0 build; please sign-off again
|
Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to a fix we made for OProfile's feature after our previous 0.2.0
> candidate build, I had to re-spin 0.2.0 to include that fix. I've done
> a quick test both from the zip and the update site and everything (the
> org.eclipse.linuxtools.all feature) installs which is better than with
> the previous candidate build. Things generally seem to work, too
> (massif, memcheck, OProfile, autotools, stubby, specfile editor).
>
> Nothing has changed code-wise other than the fixes to OProfile's
> feature.xml so it *should* be an easy smoke test. I've stopped regular
> builds going to updates-nightly until we're satisfied with this build
> for 0.2.0. Once we're finished with this, I'll turn them back on. You
> can test from either the Update zip in the Hudson build [1]
> or from our update site:
>
> http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/updates-nightly
>
> I'd like another round of sign-offs from the following individuals just
> to confirm that the build is good for 0.2.0. If anyone else has time to
> verify it's ready to be released, that'd be appreciated :)
>
> Kent
> Elliott
> Alex
> Jeff
>
> Responding here with a "good to go" or "not good to go" is sufficient.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew
>
> [1]
> https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-linuxtools-Ganymede/211/
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
OProfile is good to go.
