This overlaps with our Eclipse IoT WG Server Platform call
L Can we do on hour earlier or later?
Regards,
Kai
From: leshan-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leshan-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julien Vermillard
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:09 PM
To: leshan developer discussions
Subject: Re: [leshan-dev] roadmap hangout?
Agenda tentative (please add any ideas/comments in the thread):
- new features in the client and the bootstrap server
- release plan and version numbering, do we should try to get a 1.0 for LWM2M and release a 0.9 before?
- Leshan clustering (rationales, impact in Leshan and Californium)
Julien
Sounds like a good plan. I'll wrangle people up from our end on it.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Hudalla Kai (INST/ESY1) <Kai.Hudalla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think this is an excellent idea
J In particular, I think we should discuss the scope of a 1.0.0 release, e.g. should
it be aligned with the “hopefully soon to be released” 1.0 version of the LWM2M spec?
Regards,
Kai
Since a few questions were raised about which version of the spec we should support, TCP support or clusterisation support, I think it would be a good idea to organize a little chat session.
the idea would be to discuss about the roadmap and to synchronize our feature and release plans.
WDYT?
_______________________________________________
leshan-dev mailing list
leshan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/leshan-dev
_______________________________________________
leshan-dev mailing list
leshan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/leshan-dev
|