Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[jwt-dev] CQs

Hi all,

 

concerning the CQ issue, I’ve talked Sharon Corbett of the Eclipse IP team who has been really supportive.

 

She said that, as Mickael already suspected, CQs only have to be created if:

 

-          there is third party code or cryptography involved

-          some of the code has been written by non-committers (contributors)

-          some of the code has been written outside/before the JWT project

 

If this is not the case, these important points remain:

 

-          The submission should be under the supervision of the PMC. Sharon talked to Wayne who said that it is not necessary to post on the PMC mailing list if the PMC is informed about the ongoing development in the project, however it should be posted on the dev mailing list and a bugzilla entry with attached code should be created.

-          The submitted files must have all necessary copyright information like correct headers and be published under the EPL.

 

Effectively, for us this means:

 

-          We can submit code that conforms(!) to the aforementioned requirements at any time and we do NOT need to write CQs for these components

-          The IP team was under the impression that the currently pending CQs were entered because the code came from outside JWT. I’m not quite sure if this is the case or not since Florian submitted most of them. If this is actually not true, then the CQs can be discarded and we can include these components in JWT 0.5.0. However, we have to wait until Florian comes back since he has to confirm himself that the code complies to the requirements.

-          All in all this means that we can probably release the transformation components as part of 0.5.0 a few days after the workflow editor (when Florian comes back) and we do not have to write CQs for new components like examples for extension points.

 

Nevertheless, Sharon encouraged us not to hesitate to contact the Eclipse team if something IP releated seems not quite clear and also suggested to take a look at the visualized eclipse legal process:

http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf

 

Regards,

Christian


Back to the top