Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jta-dev] Intending to create a 2.0.1-RC1
I am going to pick back up on this tomorrow (for me), the https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/view/Enabled/job/TCK_edit-glassfish/ job is not passing parameters to https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/view/Enabled/job/TCK_run_pipeline/ correctly and I have made and will make further changes to the job.

(Also listing repos in https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/view/Enabled/job/NexusStaging-list,close,drop,release/ is not working but it might be possible that won't be necessary to have).

On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 16:46, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I had a bit of trouble with CI jobs but things are good now and I am proceeding to make the 2.0.1-RC1

On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 12:51, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Given we have the changes complete, I intend to move forward with the 2.0.1-RC1 release. I would like to see that https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/view/Enabled/job/TCK_build-glassfish/7/ passes and that we then have a passed build of https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/view/Enabled/job/TCK_run_pipeline/ first.

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 18:26, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is some background to the change in https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/186

I have updated https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/pull/202 and hopefully that will pass CI at least.

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 17:01, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not really sure why grgrgrzybak added the 1.2 and 1.3 exports here: 


It seems very wrong, but I'm not sure what the line of thinking was.





On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:56 PM Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jakarta.transaction-api doesn't seem to have changed from Jakarta EE 9. That said, I have a PR that I hope can work: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/pull/202

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 16:41, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have had a look inside a recent built version, I am wondering if it is this `Bundle-SymbolicName` which is jakarta.transaction-api that might be the difference?:

Manifest-Version: 1.0
Archiver-Version: Plexus Archiver
Created-By: Apache Maven Bundle Plugin
Built-By: jenkins
Build-Jdk: 11.0.2
Automatic-Module-Name: jakarta.transaction
Bnd-LastModified: 1643898344762
Build-Jdk-Spec: 11
Bundle-Description: Jakarta(TM) Transactions 2.0 API Design Specificatio
 n
Bundle-DocURL: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j
Bundle-License: http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0, https://www.gnu.or
 g/software/classpath/license.html
Bundle-ManifestVersion: 2
Bundle-Name: jakarta.transaction API
Bundle-SymbolicName: jakarta.transaction-api
Bundle-Vendor: EE4J Community
Bundle-Version: 2.0.1
Export-Package: javax.transaction;uses:="javax.interceptor,javax.transac
 tion.xa,javax.enterprise.util,javax.enterprise.context";version="1.2",j
 avax.transaction;uses:="javax.interceptor,javax.transaction.xa,javax.en
 terprise.util,javax.enterprise.context";version="1.3"
Extension-Name: jakarta.transaction
Implementation-Vendor: EE4J Community
Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.glassfish
Implementation-Version: 2.0.1
Import-Package: jakarta.enterprise.context;version="[3.0,4)",jakarta.ent
 erprise.util;version="[3.0,4)",jakarta.interceptor;version="[2.0,3)",ja
 vax.enterprise.context,javax.enterprise.util,javax.transaction.xa
Require-Capability: osgi.ee;filter:="(&(osgi.ee=JavaSE)(version=1.8))"
Specification-Vendor: Oracle Corporation
Specification-Version: 2.0
Tool: Bnd-5.1.1.202006162103

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 16:38, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you, Arjan. I wonder if the OSGi information in the transaction jar isn't identifying itself as jakarta.transaction. I will take a look at that.

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 16:33, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you pretty print the OSGi/Felix output it's a bit easier to see:

Unable to resolve
    org.glassfish.main.resources.mail-connector [207]
    missing requirement
        &(package = jakarta.resource) (version >= 2.0.0) (!(version >= 3.0.0))
        caused by:
            Unable to resolve
                jakarta.resource-api [148]
                missing requirement
                    &(package = jakarta.transaction) (version >= 2.0.0) (!(version >= 3.0.0)))]

This by itself looks somewhat strange, since 2.0.1 is obviously in that range. Might rather be that it's not found at all.

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms


_______________________________________________
jta-dev mailing list
jta-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jta-dev
_______________________________________________
jta-dev mailing list
jta-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jta-dev
_______________________________________________
jta-dev mailing list
jta-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jta-dev

Back to the top