[jta-dev] Any objections to not requiring a review from a committer for

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[jta-dev] Any objections to not requiring a review from a committer for any PR raised by a committer merging their PR?

From: Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:15:06 +0100
Delivered-to: jta-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jta-dev>
List-help: <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jta-dev>, <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jta-dev>, <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

Would anyone object to not requiring a review from a committer for any PR raised by a committer merging their PR?

I guess we should choose an amount of days to wait for feedback? Maybe 7 days from when the PR was opened?

I am not sure if there is a procedure to go through to formalise this so I will leave this thread open for any feedback until at least Tuesday 10am UTC+0.

Thanks,

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jta-dev] Any objections to not requiring a review from a committer for any PR raised by a committer merging their PR?
  - From: Jonathan Gallimore

Prev by Date: Re: [jta-dev] Jakarta Transactions 2.0 for Jakarta EE 9 remaining items
Next by Date: Re: [jta-dev] Any objections to not requiring a review from a committer for any PR raised by a committer merging their PR?
Previous by thread: [jta-dev] FYI: re-enabled TCK testing for PR (and updated some jobs)
Next by thread: Re: [jta-dev] Any objections to not requiring a review from a committer for any PR raised by a committer merging their PR?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs