Re: [jgit-dev] Should AUTO_FOLLOW cause non-annotated tags to be fetched

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jgit-dev] Should AUTO_FOLLOW cause non-annotated tags to be fetched if they are not part of fetch?

From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:16:29 -0800
Delivered-to: jgit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jgit-dev>
List-help: <mailto:jgit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jgit-dev>, <mailto:jgit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jgit-dev>, <mailto:jgit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 06:29, Slawomir Ginter <sginter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I use jGit to implement git plugin for a CI server.
>
> If I set Transport.setTagOpt(TagOpt.AUTO_FOLLOW) I expect it NOT to
> request fetching non-annotated tags (ie having peeledObjectId == null)
> that point to a branch I am not interested in.

I agree, there are bugs in FetchProcess surrounding that code. However
I don't agree with your fix.

Please see this change in our review system:

  http://egit.eclipse.org/r/2642

-- 
Shawn.

References:
- [jgit-dev] Should AUTO_FOLLOW cause non-annotated tags to be fetched if they are not part of fetch?
  - From: Slawomir Ginter

Prev by Date: [jgit-dev] Should AUTO_FOLLOW cause non-annotated tags to be fetched if they are not part of fetch?
Next by Date: [jgit-dev] Project meta data is out of date for technology.jgit
Previous by thread: [jgit-dev] Should AUTO_FOLLOW cause non-annotated tags to be fetched if they are not part of fetch?
Next by thread: [jgit-dev] Improving ObjectIdSubclassMap performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs