Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jetty-users] TLS ALPN ACME Lets Encrypt challange

Hi, Simone,

I do need to create my own ALPNServerConnectionFactory because on startup of the OSGi environment the SPI FLY might be too early detecting ALPN processors. My ALPNServerConnectionFactory implementation now has a OSGi ServiceTracker for ALPN processors dealing with the OSGi livecycle and initializing and adding any ALPNProcessor.Server services found. The bundle implementing the ALPNServerConnectionFactory and the ALPNServerConnection is set on pax-web-jetty as a bundle fragment to expand its classpath so pax-web can execute the jetty.xml:

<Item>
    <New id="alpn" class="eu.abeel.platform.security.acme.api.JettyAlpnServerConnectionFactory">
        <Arg type="String">
            <Property name="jetty.alpn.protocols" default="acme-tls/1, http/1.1"/>
        </Arg>
        <Set name="defaultProtocol">
            <Property name="jetty.alpn.defaultProtocol" default="http/1.1"/>
         </Set>
    </New>
</Item>

Within the ALPNProcessor I was now expecting to solve the ACME (acme-tls/1) challenge, or am I mistaken about this handshake flow with Lets Encrypt?


On 24/11/2022 09:49, Simone Bordet wrote:
Hi,

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:53 PM Info <info@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for the answers so far, my current setup is working until the
service loader starts to search for ALPN processors.

2022-11-23T15:14:49,690 | WARN  | paxweb-config-1-thread-1 |
XmlConfiguration                 | 86 - org.eclipse.jetty.util -
9.4.18.v20190429 | Config error at <Call id="wanhttpsConnector"
name="addConnector"><Arg>

Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Server ALPNProcessors!

To make it even more difficult I am on an OSGi environment so I am
adding SPI FLY at the moment so the ALPNServerConnectionFactory can find
my ACME ALPN processor.
You don't need to write your own ALPN processor.

If I understood correctly any call without an acme-tls/1 protocol header
(but with the default http/1.1 protocol) will just continue in the chain
into the handlers?
You just specify jetty.alpn.protocols=acme-tls/1, http/1.1.

A connection attempt that carries the TLS ALPN extension of
"acme-tls/1" will complete the TLS handshake, but then it won't find a
ConnectionFactory, so the connection will be closed.

A connection attempt that carries the TLS ALPN extension of "http/1.1"
will complete the TLS handshake, find the HttpConnectionFactory, and
proceed handling HTTP requests that arrive on the connection.



Back to the top