Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jetty-users] Jetty 12 schedule?
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 20:08:36 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 128.146.138.10) smtp.rcpttodomain=eclipse.org smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=osu.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=osu.edu; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu] dkim=[1,1,header.d=osu.edu] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=osu.edu])
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=osu.edu; dkim=pass header.d=osu.edu; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=q8KFdDRdm9iugJsgge+7QI4QzqH6zJ7Q/p4kYzsfxRE=; b=oTvan7GhRJuBR1cj79QGJAiOEz4ldt4s+UyRaD2i8VK+D7oIlVK9aKx9wb+Y1JPONcbuYEBws6KLSDlfNVK91zr7wtySr16tRNrypl8bHZC8zHB5XnuwW7gBcekmfBqLkLgI4u/h27DLubLXjbVU8fGOzRbLjpV15AKMlS4eU7rJmQZpXx2HhB8NqRXuNq4waszdEhv9IH3oQGq2O0UTyNdUxOTl0Jf1PhyGBq9JiwNuipLZOlM3LRKRFrEz1WINA9TSWK7Rj7Rs9QcToWumNr/Fj0AOoEoPdygzdHQdms9dIWEamDZJwCJeMCqJWIAZy1Qtyt/FTTs974SeR/ys+A==
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=q8KFdDRdm9iugJsgge+7QI4QzqH6zJ7Q/p4kYzsfxRE=; b=XuyqLblX24msww5utGQesUTx3c5FT912vKKoYkHbZQ6vKtYIdnEBeXbEChWtF6x68FCDPPG0zzCzgJAom/CawLOrfEzLmxEE1SnJoY/acP9a0iW6a4+gopDHZg9cVnmZBk2HHBvl5N4z16ZsaW2Pq4beUWmNiuF4eb5I+u40Nv2dsmaFx6sUDu4Eq7JmnYITb+XVoORsVD/FSqsDyl72BVdaACW4Dc22gs/yiSToQTptuUceWSbsC+zcx/Wnu8h9NFUVfmpk28aLQ3LBfPzOc8eTAZKBFBSLZjNp+ZZR6IVNN4+l1mrBmqi/LCIUobIhZQbXDUoBhbb36TxWH+AgzA==
  • Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=GW7NvVi5hm/s5IXR+RjayKDWantIcAHBladR/Jj8rQ/HJldAftqe1k85d90i0dGswG8zs59Jx3BgUscO18dkjrgmf2O5vgrXBtXtX/kogomEpsq+EGvfGWGC6EQHEAki2lRGufSRKmE7KYsQXMaeDw3TkgbdPtkb42ZC38wC1yJUq08pPIkI5v9V6Ncm9LFC85BsiZBs3TWTRk1Ia/vapS8Rc9WL/bL8ePpC8yoKXTr4pa+6MF7lO9iX3wn+cb99t2lhqcpttPXtPp6qKmxvKqri/Jv2MuzzVkW8rAk2evNN5wE5RZG31GTiovhRI+9toYSjOpxbrnO5WZvnMC1VYA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=S1X0dqYkjPmENxlRo9LYRhNmzN5E2K2bbTlVN1C5j+3esatGtB/QeXzbPHojHP3lO8bnQ5HfzSPgoZHNv2F57UPDtPAv/GWqwlzdaP1H+mmIKl72cgC1CQDkQ4Gm8HdfrVbgvXCwDZbfVdUqDG/GzwqZaGRBbePq3JkAvLppQdTi3KvQoVc07JxPUc0hE8gCmZL6+Kinroq196M2S7x2Qz2Po/dQrxmuDVUfMMFURVX/DyZZzHPLYbxCdGqqZzIcaS1sUdw6abdB2WCMlE5dZvTa91FR+71GBnN3EFHgieIYpxv8vYLBzHF40CdsiXCf7sVX3mh6C5D3Qq1xrnx+1w==
  • Delivered-to: jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jetty-users/>
  • List-help: <mailto:jetty-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
  • List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users>, <mailto:jetty-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
  • List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jetty-users>, <mailto:jetty-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
  • Thread-index: AQHY9Ghs/kXpTHwkrUqN86vWo3WTQa43BFG2//+tJIA=
  • Thread-topic: [jetty-users] Jetty 12 schedule?
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.66.22102801
>    If you are asking about supporting jakarta. * servlets, that is Jetty 11.  

Nope. That was our plan but we have facades that implement the servlet interfaces by delegating to the container's, and that doesn't work because...

> Jetty 12 will support multiple servlet versions.

I'm refering specifically to the fact that Servlet 5.0 and 6.0, in the Jakarta namespace, are not compatible because they've removed some deprecated methods and interfaces and added others. Implementing both in some system is problematic, at minimum.

We haven't explored every trick of course.

-- Scott

Back to the top