Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements

From: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:07:55 -0600
Delivered-to: jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jetty-users>
List-help: <mailto:jetty-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users>, <mailto:jetty-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jetty-users>, <mailto:jetty-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> One additional question: do you think it is worthwhile to support HTTP/2 for newer browsers (which most of our users have) while at the same time trying to uphold support for IE9?

Last time I checked, not even https://microsoft.com/ supported anything older then MSIE11 (due to them disabling TLS/1.0 and TLS/1.1 on the server side)

Also, the last time MSIE9 had over 1% market share was July 2016 (Dropped below 1% in August 2016, currently under 0.01%)

Microsoft Support has also declared anything older then MSIE11 as End of Life.

Joakim Erdfelt / joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
  - From: Silvio Bierman

References:
- [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
  - From: Silvio Bierman
- Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
  - From: Joakim Erdfelt
- Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
  - From: Joakim Erdfelt
- Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
  - From: Silvio Bierman

Prev by Date: Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
Next by Date: Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
Previous by thread: Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
Next by thread: Re: [jetty-users] HTTP/2 requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs