[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jetty-dev] minimal supported JVM class format
|
Thomas,
ok, clear. Thanks for your speedy reply.
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 26 feb. 2013, at 13:26, Thomas Becker <tbecker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> René, please skip RC1 or add the fix as described here in the mailing list.
>
> You'll need jdk 1.7.x to run jetty-9. Reason is as described here: http://webtide.intalio.com/2012/08/jetty-9-its-coming/
>
> Am 2/26/13 12:33 PM, schrieb René Jansen:
>> I have subscribed to this list because I have plans for netrexx.org and maybe rexxla.org that involve Jetty. I am running with version 9 RC0; RC1 did not bring me a lot of luck yet. This remark is mostly aimed at RC2; I see that the TimerScheduler bug has been corrected.
>>
>> RC1 on IBM J9 1.6.0 gives me an UnsupportedClassVersionError: JVMCFRE003. I can built it myself but my question regards the minimals supported JVM version: what is it?
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> René Vincent Jansen
>> Amsterdam
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-dev mailing list
>> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-dev mailing list
> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev