[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jdt-core-dev] Re: [platform-releng-dev] Issue in JDT/Core
|
Frederic is looking at addressing this issue, which is good you found.
Martin
Aeschlimann/Zuric
h/IBM@IBMCH To
Sent by: "Eclipse JDT Core developers list."
jdt-core-dev-boun <jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
ces@xxxxxxxxxxx cc
Subject
04/07/2005 11:14 Re: [jdt-core-dev] Re:
AM [platform-releng-dev] Issue in
JDT/Core
Please respond to
"Eclipse JDT Core
developers list."
Sorry, I received your mail after releasing. The assert is currently
commented out and the problem described in bug 90580. The problem must also
have existed with the version as released in the integration build, the
difference was just that we didn't had an assert that checked that a
preference setting was existing. It seems that the code was and is (again)
quite tolerant on missing options.
Martin
Philippe P Mulet/France/IBM@IBMFR
Sent by:
jdt-core-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx To
"Eclipse JDT Core developers
list."
07.04.2005 10:54 <jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Please respond to Subject
"Eclipse JDT Core developers Re: [jdt-core-dev] Re:
list." <jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> [platform-releng-dev] Issue
in JDT/Core
Martin, please do not release any further change until the issue you
mention is also resolved.
Removing the assert is not a good way, if the assert makes sense there.
Martin
Aeschlimann/Zuric
h/IBM@IBMCH To
Sent by: jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
jdt-core-dev-boun cc
ces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
[jdt-core-dev] Re:
04/07/2005 10:09 [platform-releng-dev] Issue in
AM JDT/Core
Please respond to
"Eclipse JDT Core
developers list."
Sorry to everybody. I prepared a fix, ran all the test but got distracted
and forgot to release.
The Assertion is in fact correct and points to a problem in some other
code: JavaCore.getOptions at this point returns a map that contains on 5
entries.
I commented the assert out, but it would be good if somebody could have a
look at that.
bug is https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=90446
Martin
Philippe P Mulet/France/IBM@IBMFR
Sent by:
platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx To
jdt-core-dev@eclip
se.org
07.04.2005 09:20 cc
Subject
Please respond to [platform-releng-d
"Eclipse platform release engineering list." ev] Issue in
<platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> JDT/Core
I caught last night a bogus change in DOM AST rewriter, which would have
caused 111 failures in our nightly tests.
I reverted the offending code to last integration state, but missed one
reference from JUnit tests.
So, we should expect one compile error in one of our test suite. It has
been fixed now in HEAD.
JDT/Core committers: our rule is: NO change is good if ANY test fails, even
worse when heading back home.
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev
_______________________________________________
jdt-core-dev mailing list
jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev
_______________________________________________
jdt-core-dev mailing list
jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev
_______________________________________________
jdt-core-dev mailing list
jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev