Re: [jaxrs-dev] [External] : Re: Use of "JAX-RS" in javadoc

[Santiago Pericas-Geertsen <santiago.pericasgeertsen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 6, 2021, at 4:59 AM, Markus KARG <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The use of the acronym JAX-RS is fine as long as the document clearly says what it refers to. There is no hard requirement to remove it or keep it removed everywhere.

 That’s correct. Other EE specs have continued to use those acronyms as well. My preference is to progressively switch to Jakarta REST instead.

— Santiago

 

Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Ron Sigal
Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2021 01:22
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Betreff: [jaxrs-dev] Use of "JAX-RS" in javadoc

 

Hi,

I have a historical question. In pull request https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxrs-api/pull/779 "Changes for Jakarta EE 8 Release", the use of "JAX-RS" was removed (version 2.1.6), but it reappeared in version 3.0.0.

I can't find any discussion on https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxrs-api/issues or this mailing list about the reappearance. It just came back in commit
a2f52e8b489e0ab8fe56adbd9174be5cf6302b64 "Initial commit of the JAX-RS API sources and examples." Is there some discussion somewhere? I'm curious what happened.

Thanks,
Ron

 

 

_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!O2dbdelwvUB3mX7H6vDjyzhuHTwhAPkSitwpsRzUyenRPCaLXv2i9O01wW3b9daPzFDQ-9k3Ug$