| Yes, the diff isn’t that useful. I will reformat it into more a changelog. I find it useful and don’t see the benefit of eagerly remove it (especially since it is linked in the original approval).
— Santiago
I do not see a benefit from the summary either, as this is simply a non-comprehensive list, while Github already provides a comprehensive list with the Milestones feature. -Markus I actually like the "Summary of changes" section, as it is effectively a changelog. But I agree that we don't need the diff. I don't see the actual use, as one can recreate it from scratch using "git diff 2.1.1 2.1.2" at any time. -Markus So do we need to keep that page or can we discard it? I’d rather keep it for our records. Perhaps we should create one for 2.1.2, may be useful after some time. I created that wiki during the 2.1.1 approval process because they requested a detailed list of changes. Based on what you said, we may not need this for 2.1.2. what is this WIKI page for? Who needs that? Do I have to provide a similar one for 2.1.2?
--
|
