Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [EXTERNAL] Re: What to do about "Develop common

[Ed Burns <Edward.Burns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello @Patrick Huang.

 

I am grooming the backlog and came across this issue, jea-75-cross-spec-tck-changes, which includes your work. Can you please give us an update? It’s been a few weeks and this work is still just as important as ever.

 

Ed

 

 

| edburns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | office: +1 954 727 1095

| Calendar Booking: https://aka.ms/meetedburns

|

| Please don't feel obliged to read or reply to this e-mail outside

| of your normal working hours.

|

| Reply anonymously to this email: https://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/contact

 

From: Patrick Huang <reducebykey@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 5:53 PM
To: Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: jakartaee-tck developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Ed Burns <Edward.Burns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [EXTERNAL] Re: What to do about "Develop common reporting / summary format for TCK summaries"

 

You don't often get email from reducebykey@xxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is important

I have checked the current TCK execution results, for instance, running the XA module using run_jakataeetck.sh xa. The XA module will generate a summary.txt file in the directory $jakartaeetck-report/xa/text/, which includes the results. This file lists cases that have passed, failed, or encountered errors.

I think we can execute a command/program after completing all tests to aggregate the summary.txt files from all testing modules. The goal is to generate a Markdown file similar to https://github.com/apusic/aas-tck/blob/master/aas_v10_ee9_full.md. This file can be posted when announcing the certification results.

However, note that my investigation does not cover modules such as DI, CDI, Bean Validation, and Debugging. These modules require separate research to determine the handling approach.

Patrick

 

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 11:19 PM Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Patrick,

 

Thanks for volunteering to work on https://github.com/jakartaee/platform/issues/426 I assigned it to myself but as mentioned in my comment just added, we can consider it assigned to PatrickHuang888.

 

Scott

 

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:58 PM Patrick Huang via jakartaee-tck-dev <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, please! 

My GitHub id is PatrickHuang888

 

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:11 AM Ed Burns <Edward.Burns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks for the offer to help. May I assign the issue to you? What is your GitHub userId?

 

| edburns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | office: +1 954 727 1095

| Calendar Booking: https://aka.ms/meetedburns

|

| Please don't feel obliged to read or reply to this e-mail outside

| of your normal working hours.

|

| Reply anonymously to this email: https://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/contact

 

From: jakartaee-tck-dev <jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Patrick Huang via jakartaee-tck-dev <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 22:13
To: jakartaee-tck developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Patrick Huang <reducebykey@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] What to do about "Develop common reporting / summary format for TCK summaries"

Sorry for mispress the key because my input method.

I mean maybe I can allocate some time to help this.

I will look into refactoring TCK output first and give out some thoughts.

 

Patrick

 

On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 10:06 AM Patrick Huang <reducebykey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi guys,

I'm Patrick from Apusic, I think maybe I can allocate help on this 

 

On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 1:43 AM Arjan Tijms via jakartaee-tck-dev <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

 

I'd like to see that still happen really, and I guess it has been forgotten about.Obviously an issue is resources. I'd love to work in this personally but I'm stretching myself way too thin atm.

 

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

 

 

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 21:23, Edward Burns via jakartaee-tck-dev <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello TCK Dev,

 

While doing some backlog grooming, I came across this issue. https://github.com/jakartaee/platform/issues/426 .

 

This one was opened nearly two years ago and has zero discussion. What is the status of this? Can it simply be closed?

 

Thanks,

 

Ed

 

| edburns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | office: +1 954 727 1095

| Calendar Booking: https://aka.ms/meetedburns

|

| Please don't feel obliged to read or reply to this e-mail outside

| of your normal working hours.

|

| Reply anonymously to this email: https://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/contact

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev