Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Is Arquillian still alive?

[Olivier Lamy <olamy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't have issues with Arquillian itself but more about the
maintenance reactivity on pull requests (especially for Jetty).
Might be a bit too complicated to use testcontainers here with our use
case as it potentially means different code for each containers
whereas Arquillian will ensure a unique code (I hope :)) and could be
slower.

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 6:03 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro
<jlmonteiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That is a good point Olivier.
>
> I'm myself a bit worried about setting a hard dependency to Arquillian in the TCK
> I have overall the same feeling and I see a lot of people moving away from Arquillian to testcontainers.
>
> Wondering if we are doing a long term choice with Arquillian.
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:54 AM Olivier Lamy <olamy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> We discussed using arquillian which sounds like a good idea.
>> I started looking at Jetty support but I have a bit of concern on the project.
>> last commit 31/03/2017 [1]
>> and tomcat support is not better [2]
>>
>> I guess we have some contacts here @ redhat to ask if
>> maintenance/upgrade is scheduled?
>> As Jetty committer I'm happy to do the job on jetty support.
>>
>> Toughts?
>>
>> cheers
>> --
>> Olivier
>> [1] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-container-jetty
>> [2] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-container-tomcat
>> _______________________________________________
>> jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
>> jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
> jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev



-- 
Olivier