Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] GlassFish Passing the TCK

[Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/15/20 8:58 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> This is fantastic news, Steve! Thanks for the update!
>
> Cutting an RC for GF along with the corresponding TCK would probably be 
> a good idea.  From what I am learning though, we're not out of the woods 
> yet... There are still some discussions going on that we may have 
> accidentally excluded too many tests when the "corba" scrubbing 
> happened.  That is still an active investigation.  Bottom line is that 
> the TCK may not be in its final form yet...

I like Kevin's summary of 
https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-tck-dev/msg01042.html better 
than mine!  :-)

Scott

> ---------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Sutter
> STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
> e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
> phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter>
>
>
>
> From: "Steve Millidge (Payara)" <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: glassfish developer discussions <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
> jakartaee-tck        developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 10/15/2020 04:14
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [jakartaee-tck-dev] GlassFish Passing the TCK
> Sent by: jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi All, Are we in agreement that GlassFish is currently passing the Full 
> and Web...
> *This Message Is From an External Sender*
> This message came from outside your organization.
>
> Hi All,
>
> Are we in agreement that GlassFish is currently passing the Full and Web 
> Profile TCKs, the CDI TCKs and the other standalone TCKs?
>
> Is it consensus view that we should tag a new milestone or RC for 
> GlassFish or shall we wait for the TCK runs on Monday?
>
> Summary  test results
>
> CDI TCK
>
> _https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/cditck-porting/job/master/106/_ <https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/cditck-porting/job/master/106/>
>
> Combined run of Full Profile_
> __https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-900/49/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html_ 
> <https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-900/49/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html>
>
> _https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-900/48/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html_ 
> <https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-900/48/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html>
>
> Combined Run of Web Profile
>
> _https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-web-900/40/_ 
> <https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-web-900/40/>_
> __https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-web-900/42/_ 
> <https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/eftl-jakartaeetck-run-web-900/42/>
>
> and my understanding is that we also don’t have standalone failures 
> suggest that we are passing all tests at the moment.
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
> jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev 
> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
> jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev