Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [ejb-dev] Removal of tests for pruned technologi

[Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/9/20 2:20 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
> On 9/29/20 12:38 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote:
> > As discussed today, I think consistency would be my choice.
> >
> > I'll look at the impact in terms of TCK.
>
> Please do let us know as I think the javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject used 
> in the Platform TCK (for EJB tests) will be a problem on JDK 11.

Please note that (draft) 
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/543 was created last 
night (thanks David Blevins!) and is work in progress (we are currently 
running some tests via 
https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jakartaee-tck-scottmarlow/job/interop/2/ 
against the (temporary) interop branch.

> Scott
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro <http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro>
> > http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:36 PM Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx 
> > <mailto:smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     During the Platform call [1] today it was pointed out that TCKs 
> > should
> >     consistently handle all pruned/removed technologies the same (e.g.
> >     either remove related tests or allow related tests to be run
> >     optionally).
> >
> >     We removed the Jakarta Platform EE TCK tests for Jakarta XML
> >     Registries,
> >     Jakarta XML RPC, Jakarta Deployment, Jakarta Management but recently
> >     updated the Platform TCK to treat the com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30 that use
> >     Corba as optional [2].  By default the EJB tests that use Corba 
> > are not
> >     run (default is !rmi_iiop&!corba ).
> >
> >     I added David Belevins + the EJB ml to ask what the impact would 
> > be if
> >     we adjusted the changes made in [2] to instead remove the ejb30 tests
> >     that use Corba?
> >
> >     We also updated the com/sun/ts/tests/rmiiiop tests to be optional as
> >     well [2].  By default these tests are not run (default is
> >     !rmi_iiop&!corba ).
> >
> >     Feedback on removing the RMI-IIOP tests instead of marking them
> >     optional
> >     by default would also be appreciated.
> >
> >     Thank you Guru for all of your hard work and patience on [2].
> >
> >     Scott
> >
> >     [1]
> >     
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EJ2ilaPhMnQqa3aw6AmwjRbBPGL3_np4uuwklgfqPZI/edit?pli=1 
> >
> >     
> > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EJ2ilaPhMnQqa3aw6AmwjRbBPGL3_np4uuwklgfqPZI/edit?pli=1> 
> >
> >
> >     [2] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/521
> >     <https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/521>
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     ejb-dev mailing list
> >     ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> >     https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ejb-dev
> >     <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ejb-dev>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ejb-dev mailing list
> > ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
> > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ejb-dev