Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [EXTERNAL] Should the Jakarta EE 11 BOM cov

[Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I should of asked the same question about javax.rmi.CORBA which I think references org.omg.CORBA classes as per our EE 10 signature map file https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/blob/10.0.x/src/com/sun/ts/tests/signaturetest/signature-repository/javax.rmi.sig for that set of classes. 

A question for our TCK call on Wednesday is whether our EE 11 Platform TCK should validate that EE 11 implementations include the set of classes defined in https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/blob/10.0.x/src/com/sun/ts/tests/signaturetest/signature-repository/javax.rmi.sig?

I'll be on Wednesday TCK call but not the Tuesday Platform call.

Scott

On 1/27/25 4:02 PM, Ed Burns wrote:

Great questions. I have added it to the agenda for tomorrow.

Ed

From: jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Scott Marlow via jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, January 27, 2025 at 15:25
To: jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [jakartaee-platform-dev] Should the Jakarta EE 11 BOM cover classes like org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl?

I'm looking into generating the EE 11 Platform TCK signature files from the dependencies defined in jakarta.platform:jakarta.jakartaee-api:jar:11.0.0-M4 but do not see the org.omg dependencies covered by that.  Should we include the org.omg.CORBA package in the EE 11 BOM?  If not, should EE 11 implementations provide the org.omg.CORBA classes?

Note that we did require EE 10 implementations to include the org.omg.CORBA classes which we probably should do for EE 11 also but thought I would make sure since we said the EE 11 BOM should cover all EE 11 classes.

Scott