Thank you Scott and Jared,
I have merged Scott Stark's
PR 998.
Scott Stark (SS) wrote:
SS> We just need an update of the specification milestone.
At this point, I have been operating under the notion that all changes since the previous milestone will show up in the first "release candidate" of the specification when we get to the point when we are preparing
the artifacts for ballot for Web Profile and Platform Profile.
Is this ok?
Ed
From: jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Scott Stark via jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, December 13, 2024 at 10:48
To: jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Platform Specification references to Security Permission
So this section had already been removed. We just need an update of the specification milestone. I did create a pr to cleanup a couple of security manager permission refs.
That section needs to be updated to state that the EE11 platform does not support the use of SecurityManager based permission requirements for applications. I'll create a PR.
Platform Specification has references to Security Permission which cannot be implemented without a Security Manager within JVM.
Please advice me on "Code Authorization" section of the Platform Specification.
No right to create modifications or derivatives of Eclipse Foundation documents is granted pursuant to this license, except anyone may prepare and distribute derivative works and portions of this document in software that implements the specification, in supporting
materials accompanying such software, and in documentation of such software, PROVIDED that all such works include the notice below.
|
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev