Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Question about forking the TCK Signature te

[Kyle Aure <kylejaure@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree that forking this into https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck-tools would be the best place for something like this.

I do not think doing the same for Arquillian is necessary.  Arquillian is a project that has active committers, an issue backlog, and does new releases when necessary

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:23 PM Arjan Tijms via jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 20:08, Scott Marlow via jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Since this library [2]  is so integral to Jakarta EE TCK testing should eclipse manage a fork of this project so we can make these kind of changes?

While on this topic, should we do the same for base Arquillian?

(with base Arquillian I mean the Arquillian core without the dozens of projects that somehow extend it)

 

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev