This is generally the feedback we get from customers, old and new to the space. Truth be told, the Jakarta EE/MicroProfile segmentation is already cause for a lot of confusion. Core Profile is an obvious need in evolving the space. There is also no harm in having faster Core Profile only releases and independent specification releases. It’s best to not further segment unless there is truly a compelling need (which I currently honestly do not see). If anything, a path towards gradual brand convergence would be best (though that is clearly not pragmatic right now).
I understand some folks believe Jakarta EE has a brand perception issue. I tend to think it’s an issue that can be mitigated through consistent delivery, jettisoning truly damaged brands like EJB, serious innovation in implementations beyond the specifications as well as persistent, high quality marketing/advocacy.
At any rate, my main point is that maybe we should focus on delivering more high quality releases right now instead of more restructuring/reshuffling/renaming/regrouping that’s likely to get in the way of delivery and add to an already very confusing landscape that maybe actually helps no one.
Hi,
To an outsider and an end user all this sounds very confusing. Too much of everything usually makes management harder.
Perhaps it is better not to mix MP and Jakarta. Keep MP what it is, an independent(aside APIs of course) extension to Jakarta.