[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Moving MicroProfile JWT to Jakarta Security?
|
On 2022-11-14 11:22 a.m., John Clingan wrote:
As you point out, there are important non-technical differences
between the two. Any one of those could be a good reason why Jakarta
EE may wish to have its own specifications which overlap or compete
with MicroProfile specs. In other words, there can be a myriad of
reasons why competing specs may occur: business, technical,
community, vendor support, etc etc. But "MicroProfile did it first"
does not provide it with any sort of veto.
Not sure where “veto” came from. I never mentioned or implied it. I
do feel the need to say that, as a MicroProfile WG member, the tone
of the comment doesn’t feel neutral.
John,
Apologies if my tone was off. It certainly was not intended to be
anything other than neutral.
I was reacting to the comment below where you say "...I am against
moving *any* specifications out of MicroProfile to Jakarta...." Which
sounded like a pretty strong statement. Even after re-reading it, I
don't feel my interpretation was unreasonable.
But thank you for clearing up my misunderstanding. Email can certainly
be a poor communication channel sometimes.
For these reasons, I am against moving *any* specifications out of
MicroProfile to Jakarta, although I am open to the idea of moving
Jakarta specifications to MicroProfile. The exception is
concurrency, which was always intended to move to Jakarta.
