I'm wondering how we should convey this information on the
Specification page.
I think at the least, we ought to list the Jakarta EE 10 Platform
TCK as an approved compatibility validation TCK. I do not believe
we want to imply that one must run the EE 9 Platform TCK to
certify Interceptors. I think we can consider saying nothing on
the interceptors Spec. page about CDI TCK, relying on the CDI TCK
to call out the requirement for interceptor compatibility as well
as the validation that the TCK verifies interceptor compatibility.
By extension, we could say nothing on the Interceptors page but
that, at least to me, leaves me wondering -- what would a vendor
be expected to do. Perhaps something calling out (on the Spec.
page) "Platform products may certify Interceptors compatibility
for their product using the latest Platform TCK of the Platform
version they are releasing."
Anyone have thoughts on this?
(I realize this is kind of an low priority issue since few if any
implementations are going to certify Interceptors outside of one
of the other specification bodies (EE Platform or CDI TCKs).
-- Ed
_______________________________________________