Do you remember FishCAT? When do you think it could make sense to launch a similar crowdsourced testing/user acceptance/contribution effort for Jakarta EE 9?
Reza Rahman Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message -------- From: Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: 6/25/20 5:02 PM (GMT-05:00) To: JakartaEE Spec Project Leadership discussions <jakartaee-spec-project-leads@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Next up? Jakarta EE 9 in Sept!
Hi, Now that theJakarta EE 9 Milestone 1is in the bag, we need to look forward to the full Jakarta EE 9 release!
The next line
in the sand is Sept 16. This date was selected for a couple
of reasons. First and foremost, it's a week before CodeOne. This
would allow us to make some noise and steal some thunder from the Oracle
CodeOne conference. Any conference sessions that any of us have secured
for CodeOne would much more impact if we could talk about a completed Jakarta
EE 9 release. And, a secondary reason is that Sept 16 lines up with
the scheduled JakartaOne Livestream. I think we're all in agreement
that a JakartaOne Livestream without some type of Jakarta EE 9 release
would fall flat. (Of course, we can move the date of the Livestream,
if necessary. But, for now, it's just another good reason to shoot
for Sept 16...)
Using Sept 16
as the end date, I worked backwards and came up with this
proposed schedulefor the Specification PR work that needs to be completed. Since we
now have this Milestone 1 PR work under our belt, we all have a better
reading on what's required for these final PRs. The big difference
with these final PRs is that the Specifications, APIs, TCKs, and CI need
to be complete and final. Some minor tweaks to the APIs, TCKs, and
CI could still be incorporate into a third digit update release (ie. 2.0.1),
but the Specification has to be final (ie. 2.0). So, how do we accomplish
this?
The referenced
schedule has a "PR Complete" date and a "Ballot Complete"
date. Each final Specification Version requires a two week ballot
period for the Specification Committee. Each of the "Ballot
Complete" dates is exactly two weeks after the corresponding "PR
Complete" date. Thus, the expectation is that when the PR reaches
its "Complete" state, it's ready for a ballot. No more
tweaks, updates, changes after that point.
These final PRs
need to be vetted and reviewed prior to the "PR Complete" date.
We're taking an educated guess and indicating a two week review period.
Some may be much shorter (ie. JSTL), while others may take more time
(ie. EJB or Platform). But, two weeks seems like a happy medium.
I am in the process of updating
the schedule via this PRto indicate when these PRs need to be ready for reviewing (if we want to
make the Sept 16 date).
You'll notice
that moved the "PR Ready" date to July 06 for the Wave
1 Specifications (Jakarta JSON Processing,
Jakarta Dependency Injection, Jakarta _expression_ Language, Jakarta
Bean Validation, Jakarta WebSocket, Jakarta Servlet, Jakarta Activation,
Jakarta SOAP with Attachments, and Jakarta Interceptors).
And, in theory,
any of the Wave 0 Specifications could also be in a "PR Ready"
state (Jakarta Annotations, Jakarta
Concurrency, Jakarta Messaging, Jakarta Persistence, Jakarta Managed Beans,
and Jakarta Web Services Metadata).
Due to the various
implementation and testing dependencies, I know that this Wave content
will be fluid. I also know that some of the Projects are very close
to declaring their Specs, APIs, TCKs, and CI final. As we did for
the Milestone delivery, we just need to start this process to see how close
we are. If your Project has a standalone TCK and standalone CI, then
you can probably complete your Specification PRs in relative short order.
But, if you have other dependencies on other Projects such as the
Platform TCK or the Platform CI, then you'll be in the later waves.
That's enough
for this note. Let's start evaluating our individual Projects and
determining what a reasonable timeframe is for your Specification PRs.
We can adjust the labels on your respective Epic Issues to reflect
reality.
--------------------------------------------------- Kevin Sutter STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office) LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
|