Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[jakartabatch-dev] CORRECTED SUBJECT: POLL on Batch + CDI integration - (same message as previous one , sorry)


------------------------------------------------------
Scott Kurz
WebSphere / Open Liberty Batch and Developer Experience
skurz@xxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------


Inactive hide details for Scott Kurz---11/24/2021 11:25:55 AM---I'm sorry... after moving this discussion to the Platform dev lScott Kurz---11/24/2021 11:25:55 AM---I'm sorry... after moving this discussion to the Platform dev list, I completely forgot to poll our

From: Scott Kurz/Poughkeepsie/IBM
To: jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 11/24/2021 11:25 AM
Subject: PR for option 2 - status quo - Batch + CDI integration




I'm sorry... after moving this discussion to the Platform dev list, I completely forgot to poll our batch list as well.

If you haven't voted already, please weigh in at
the survey at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Z9BPW22

For background see:    
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s6bhfaDm2GyBfuggFnLz9Zo3fdgVi0gtTFlFZiPwriU  
and for discussion (most recently in the platform list but of course forking off of our original batch discussion earlier) see:  
https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-platform-dev/msg02929.html 
---

And that said, we're not going to be able to do any big changes of direction in Batch 2.1, so I'm planning to propose we continue formalizing the "status quo" of Batch+ CDI integration which the existing impls (except of course for Spring Batch) have provided.  

More on this shortly...

Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------
Scott Kurz
WebSphere / Open Liberty Batch and Developer Experience
skurz@xxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------




GIF image


Back to the top