[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakartabatch-dev] Evolving the jakarta batch standard?
|
+1 for improvements!
I'm here to help.
LieGrue,
strub
PMC member Apache Geronimo BatchEE
> Am 05.02.2020 um 17:59 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dashorst@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> I'm currently working on a project that does a lot of processing in
> steps, and other projects have used our own custom jobs framework
> (written prior to Jakarta Batch's inception), and I might advocate to
> rewriting them to Jakarta Batch. The match between the standard and
> what we are doing looks quite promising.
>
> However, there are many thousands of paper cuts that are bugging me in
> either the implementation we are using (jberet and wildfly), or the
> specification.
>
> First I'd like to hear if there's any interest in improving the batch
> specification, and if so, what are the plans?
>
> I figure that this is the right place for discussing the issues I
> encounter while trying to use the specification, to see if my
> understanding is (in)correct, and possibly improve the spec. However
> the list archive does seem to suggest that traffic on this list is a
> bit slow.
>
> I'd love to hear from the batch community if the specification can be
> improved and figure out in what way that is possible.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Martijn Dashorst
> _______________________________________________
> jakartabatch-dev mailing list
> jakartabatch-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartabatch-dev
