Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Persistence 3.2

+1 (IBM)
Thanks
Emily

On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 8:01 AM Ivar Grimstad via jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Persistence 3.2 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 11 release.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/714
https://deploy-preview-714--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/persistence/3.2/

Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on Monday, May 20, 2024, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton Information Technologies, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Ivar

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec


--
Thanks
Emily


Back to the top