Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review of Jakarta Server Pages 4.0

Not sure if Ancelmo and I vote as one (since we’re both LJC), but just in case each of us holds a vote, mine is +1 too.

On 20 Jun 2023, at 22:00, marceloancelmo <marceloancelmo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1 (LJC) 

On Tue, 20 Jun 2023, 21:29 Ivar Grimstad via jakarta.ee-spec, <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As a Jakarta EE Specification Committee member, I request the voting period for this ballot to be extended until all eligible members have voted within a maximum of 30 days according to the EFSP (https://www.eclipse.org/projects/efsp/?version=1.3#efsp-committee-approvals).

Ivar

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:42 PM David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Mark and Pages team for the update on what’s being removed.

+1 (Tomitribe)


-- 
David Blevins

On Jun 18, 2023, at 12:24 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi All,

I left a note on the PR.  Just looking for a bit of insight on how big of an impact the removals would be.



-- 
David Blevins

On Jun 12, 2023, at 2:03 AM, Ivar Grimstad via jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

I request your vote to approve and ratify the plan for Jakarta Server Pages 4.0.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to approve the plan of this release (as defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/614

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Monday, June 19, 2023, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Red Hat, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks,
Ivar
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec


_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec


--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec


Back to the top