Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT COMPLETE] Plan Review for Jakarta RESTful

[Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I declare this ballot complete and approved. The summary of the votes is below. I've marked the corresponding PRs as approved.

Congratulations!

Representative	Representative for:	Vote
Kenji Kazumura	Fujitsu	+1
Tom Watson, Emily Jiang	IBM	+1
Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov	Oracle	+1
Andrew Pielage, Petr Aubrecht	Payara	+1
David Blevins, Jean-Louis Monteiro	Tomitribe	+1
Ivar Grimstad	EE4J PMC	+1
Marcelo Ancelmo, Martijn Verburg	Participant Members	+1
Werner Keil	Committer Members	+1
Zhai Luchao	Enterprise Members	+1
Scott Stark	Enterprise Members	+1
	Total	10
Non-binding votes		Vote
Arjan Tijms	OmniFish	+1
Jun Qian	Primeton	+1
	Total	2

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:39 AM Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta RESTful Web Services.

(Note that this is a reiteration of their previously approved plan review of June 2021. It was discussed and decided in the Specification Committee that running a new plan review was appropriate rather than a progress review.)

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to approve the plan.

The relevant materials are available here:
- https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/581

- https://deploy-preview-581--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/restful-ws/4.0/

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Thursday, December 8, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Red Hat, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks,

Ivar

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.