Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Faces 4.0

It seems all issues I reported have been resolved by Arjan! Thank you Arjan!
Here is the vote:

+1 (IBM).
Emily

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 1:39 PM Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My apologies for the late reply as I missed the original notes. I have a few comments:

1. I noticed the spec doc has missing chapters:

Changes between 4.0 and 3.0

TBD

Backward Compatibility with Previous Versions

TBD

This section needs to be populated before the release.

2. In the spec doc,  the copyright statement is incorrect:
It should be Copyright (c) 2019, 2022 Eclipse Foundation.

instead of
Copyright (c) 2022 Eclipse Foundation.

has this copyright
Copyright � 2002-2010 Oracle America, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
I guess it is wrong.

4. No copyright for

Please can the above issues be fixed asap!

Thanks
Emily

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 2:39 PM kzr@xxxxxxxxxxx <kzr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Faces 4.0 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/459
https://deploy-preview-459--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/faces/4.0/

Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on Wednesday, May 17, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks,

-Kenji Kazumura
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec


--
Thanks
Emily



--
Thanks
Emily


Back to the top