Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Tags 3.0

+1 (LJC)

Marcelo Ancelmo



On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 10:28, Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1, PMC

Two small comments. Can be updated after the ballot:
- The summary section should be updated to reflect the work accomplished and does not contain proposal statements as might be found in Plan Review statement
- Duplicate links to the release record

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:41 AM Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry, disregard my comment. Just had to scroll down to find it.

Ivar

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:39 AM Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A link to a compatible implementation is missing on the spec page. Please add a link to the implementations used for ratification.
From the CCR:
Eclipse EE4J implementation of Jakarta Standard Tag Library 3.0.0
Eclipse GlassFish 7.0.0-M4
 
There should be no reason to pause the ballot for this update.

Ivar


On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:26 AM Emily Jiang via jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Tags 3.0 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:

Per the process, this will be a fourteen day ballot, ending on May 9th, 2022 that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.



--
Thanks
Emily

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec


--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 



--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 



--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec

Back to the top