[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [jakartaee/specifications] Draft of Jakarta Batch 2.1 Release Review (PR #438)
|
There seems to be some inconsistency around the version scheme of release plans. Some where using a major.minor.0 for a new release, while others are just using major.minor. Since point/service releases don't require any plan or vote, release plans for specification should probably just use a major.minor scheme consistently. The current operations guide gives not guidance on this:
2.1.0 OK?
@starksm64 question for you.. I have a few updates to make to the release record, e.g. generate IP log.
I'm wondering though..is it OK that I named this release "2.1.0"? As opposed to "2.1"? If that's wrong I should probably fix that before going too much further? I already did a Plan Review under 2.1.0 though, so maybe it's OK?
Another Question
I see in the review checklist:
Link to project release plan of the form https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.{spec}/releases/x.y/plan
So we're not going with the overall EE 10 Platform release plan?
We don't really have a separate Batch release plan in a link like this though I guess we could copy/paste the Plan Review info.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.![]()
Message ID: <jakartaee/specifications/pull/438/c1044761351@github.com>
