| Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Annotations 2.1 |
Ivar,
Thanks for information.
I understand you are talking about https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/329 .
_______________________________________________
-Kenji Kazumura
From: jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Ivar Grimstad
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 5:09 PM
To: Jakarta specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Annotations 2.1
Hi Kenji,
That is the compromise the spec committee decided on following the discussion around JSON-P last year. This is what we came up with: https://jakarta.ee/specifications/jsonp/2.0/
Ivar
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:59 AM kzr@xxxxxxxxxxx <kzr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ivar,
> - https://deploy-preview-437--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/annotations/2.1/
Do we need the following item in the specification page ?
- Compatible Implementations used for ratification.
I don’t remember if we decided to add this kind of information to index.md.
-Kenji Kazumura
From: jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Ivar Grimstad
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 3:38 AM
To: Jakarta specification disccusions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Annotations 2.1
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.
I need your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Annotations 2.1 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release.
The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).
The relevant materials are available here:
- https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/437- https://deploy-preview-437--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/annotations/2.1/
Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on Wednesday, February 9, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.
Thanks
Ivar
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.