[jakarta.ee-spec] Interceptors seems like a template spec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[jakarta.ee-spec] Interceptors seems like a template spec

From: Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:43:31 -0700
Delivered-to: jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jakarta.ee-spec/>
List-help: <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jakarta.ee-spec>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

We were discussing @Interceptors in the CDI call and realized this project does not produce a TCK. It is another spec that is relies on the platform TCK:

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/233

We also have many tests for this in the CDI TCK. This is a bad arrangement because it is one of the base api dependencies for CDI, and EJB. It would make more sense to have this in CDI and drop the platform tests and create a new standalone TCK from the existing CDI tests.

Opinions on this?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] Interceptors seems like a template spec
  - From: Scott Marlow

Prev by Date: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [jakartaee-platform-dev] Semantic Versioning Jakarta APIs
Next by Date: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] Interceptors seems like a template spec
Previous by thread: [jakarta.ee-spec] Semantic Versioning Jakarta APIs
Next by thread: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] Interceptors seems like a template spec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs